The Untapped Potential of Precision Agriculture and Digital Advisory (AI/IoT/Drones/Satellite) in Transforming Smallholder Farmers’ Productivity, Income, and Climate Resilience in India — A Secondary Data Analysis (2020–2025)

The comprehensive analysis of precision agriculture and digital advisory technologies in India reveals a transformative period from 2020-2025, marked by unprecedented government investment, technological innovation, and measurable impacts on smallholder farming communities. Despite significant adoption barriers, emerging evidence demonstrates substantial potential for enhancing agricultural productivity, farmer incomes, and climate resilience through targeted digital interventions. Key findings indicate that precision agriculture adoption has increased from 12% in 2020 to 35% in 2025, with documented yield improvements of 17-36% across major crops and income increases ranging from 24-76% for adopting farmers.^{[1][2][3][4][5]}

National and State-Level Adoption Trends of Precision Agriculture Technologies (2020-2025)

Overall Market Growth and Investment Patterns

India’s precision agriculture market experienced remarkable expansion during the study period, growing from $57 million in 2019 to an estimated $145.49 million by 2024, representing a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.12%. The government’s commitment to agricultural digitization is exemplified by the Digital Agriculture Mission, launched in September 2024 with an allocation of ₹2,817 crore, aiming to create digital identities for 11 crore farmers by 2026-27.^{[1][6][7][8][9]}

The broader agritech ecosystem witnessed substantial growth, with industry projections indicating the market could reach $24 billion by 2025. Investment patterns show a shift toward comprehensive digital solutions, with supply chain players receiving maximum funding, while precision farming and advisory segments, though nascent, show promising monetization potential. Notable funding examples include Cropin raising $31.6 million, BharatAgri securing $4.3 million, and Fasal obtaining $1.8 million for AI-driven farming intelligence solutions.^{[10][11][12][13][14][15]}

Technology-Specific Adoption Patterns

Drone technology adoption emerged as a significant trend, growing from 3% in 2020 to an estimated 25% by 2025. The government’s Kisan Drones program and subsequent Namo Drone Didi scheme, allocated ₹500 crore in 2024-25 budget, aimed to provide drones to 15,000 women self-help groups for rental services to farmers. Regulatory support through the Digital Sky Platform facilitated drone operations by categorizing airspace into green, yellow, and red zones.^[16][17]

IoT sensor deployment showed accelerated growth, particularly in soil moisture monitoring and precision irrigation systems. The integration of IoT with existing irrigation infrastructure demonstrated significant water savings, with reports of up to 3 billion liters saved through data-driven farming decisions. Mobile app usage by farmers increased dramatically from 29% in 2020 to 62% by 2025, driven by multilingual platforms and improved rural internet connectivity.^[14][5]

Satellite-based monitoring gained prominence through ISRO’s comprehensive Earth observation program, utilizing satellites like RISAT-1, Resourcesat-2, and INSAT-3D for agricultural applications including crop forecasting, drought monitoring, and disaster management. The National Programme on use of Space Technology for Agriculture (NPSTA) integrated multiple satellite-based projects, providing farmers with real-time crop and weather data.^{[18][19][20][21]}

Geographic Distribution and State-Level Variations

Punjab, Haryana, Maharashtra, Gujarat, and Andhra Pradesh emerged as leaders in precision agriculture adoption, benefiting from better infrastructure, higher farmer awareness, and stronger government support. Punjab and Haryana demonstrated the highest adoption of new crop varieties, with 82% and 65% of farmers respectively adopting improved paddy cultivars, while eastern states like Odisha lagged at only 14% adoption.^{[3][22][23][5]}

Maharashtra’s success in cotton farming exemplified regional specialization, with precision agriculture contributing to significant yield and income improvements. Gujarat’s focus on water-scarce agriculture drove innovation in pressurized irrigation methods and IoT-based water management systems. Tamil Nadu’s tissue-cultured banana cultivation demonstrated the potential for high-value crop transformation, with farmers achieving net incomes of ₹70,000-75,000 annually through precision techniques.^[24][23]

Regional disparities remained pronounced, with rainfed and eastern regions showing slower adoption due to infrastructure limitations, lower digital literacy, and limited access to credit facilities. Central and eastern India continued to struggle with unreliable water sources and higher susceptibility to climate shocks, highlighting the need for targeted interventions.^[25][5][3]

Documented Impacts on Productivity, Input Efficiency, Income and Climate Resilience

Quantified Productivity and Yield Improvements

Field studies across multiple states documented substantial yield improvements following precision agriculture adoption. Karnataka-based research spanning Bagalkot, Belgaum, Dharwad, and Haveri districts revealed remarkable results: sugarcane yields increased by 17.80% (from 43.80 to 51.60 tonnes per acre), cotton yields improved by 36.26% (from 9.10 to 12.40 quintals per acre), and chilli yields rose by 26.08% (from 4.60 to 5.80 quintals per acre).^[2]

Digital advisory services demonstrated significant impact on crop management effectiveness. The Saagu Baagu pilot program in Andhra Pradesh achieved a 21% increase in chili yield production per acre, with farmers reporting net income increases of $800 per acre in a single crop cycle, effectively doubling average income. Similar digital extension programs showed yield improvements ranging from 14-30% in areas experiencing weather variability.^[26][27]

Precision irrigation systems contributed substantially to productivity gains. Studies indicated that IoT-based soil moisture monitoring and automated irrigation systems could increase productivity by up to 20% while reducing water consumption. NABARD projections suggested precision agriculture could increase Indian farmers’ incomes by 15-20% through optimized inputs and improved crop yields.^[3][28]

Input Use Efficiency and Cost Reductions

Precision agriculture technologies demonstrated significant potential for optimizing input use. The Saagu Baagu program documented a 9% reduction in pesticide use and 5% reduction in fertilizer application while maintaining or improving crop quality. AI-driven advisory systems enabled site-specific nutrient management, reducing over-application of fertilizers and minimizing environmental impact.^[29][26][30]

Water use efficiency emerged as a critical benefit area. Digital irrigation management systems, supported by soil sensors and weather data, achieved water savings of 20% or more in multiple pilot programs. The integration of satellite data with ground-based sensors enabled precise irrigation scheduling, particularly beneficial in water-stressed regions like Gujarat and Rajasthan.^[24][31]

Pest management efficiency improved through early detection systems. AI-powered crop monitoring using drones achieved up to 95% accuracy in identifying diseases like anthracnose in cashew farming, enabling timely interventions and reducing crop losses. Predictive analytics reduced the need for prophylactic pesticide applications, leading to both cost savings and environmental benefits.^[16][31]

Income Enhancement and Economic Outcomes

Income improvements represented the most significant impact of precision agriculture adoption. Karnataka studies documented income increases of 24.51% for sugarcane (from ₹55,480 to ₹69,080 per acre), 75.63% for cotton (from ₹16,877 to ₹29,642 per acre), and 29.63% for chilli (from ₹44,880 to ₹58,181 per acre). These income improvements resulted from a combination of higher yields, better quality produce, and reduced input costs.^[2]

High-value crop cultivation showed exceptional returns through precision techniques. Tamil Nadu’s Grand Naine banana cultivation achieved net incomes of ₹70,000-75,000 annually with investments of ₹80,000-85,000 per acre, demonstrating the viability of precision agriculture for smallholder farmers. Digital advisory services in Pakistan (comparable context) showed similar patterns with average income increases of PKR 14,365 per acre among participating farmers.^[23][31]

The economic benefits extended beyond direct crop income. Digital platforms facilitated better market access, reducing dependence on intermediaries and improving price realization for farmers. E-marketplaces and direct buyer connections enabled farmers to capture higher margins, particularly for high-quality produce meeting export standards.^[32][13]

Climate Resilience and Adaptive Capacity

Climate resilience emerged as a critical benefit of precision agriculture technologies, particularly relevant given India’s vulnerability to extreme weather events. The National Innovations in Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) program documented benefits across 151 climatically vulnerable districts, focusing on drought, flood, and heat stress adaptation.^[33][30]

Early warning systems proved crucial for climate adaptation. Weather-based advisory services, delivered through mobile platforms, enabled farmers to make timely decisions regarding planting, harvesting, and protection measures. Satellite-based monitoring provided real-time alerts about drought conditions, flood risks, and pest outbreaks, allowing proactive rather than reactive management.^[30][25]

Water management technologies enhanced drought resilience. Precision irrigation systems, guided by soil moisture sensors and weather forecasts, enabled optimal water use during stress periods. Climate-smart crop varieties, supported by digital advisory on optimal planting and management practices, demonstrated improved tolerance to temperature and moisture stress.^[34][35]

Post-harvest loss reduction contributed to climate resilience by improving food security. Digital cold chain management and timely harvest alerts reduced spoilage, particularly important during extreme weather events. Real-time monitoring of storage conditions prevented significant losses, as highlighted during the 2024 onion spoilage incidents in Maharashtra.^[36]

Barriers and Enablers to Adoption

Financial and Infrastructure Constraints

High initial costs emerged as the primary barrier to precision agriculture adoption. Studies indicated that 96.05% of farmers identified high initial cost as the major constraint, particularly for equipment like IoT sensors, drones, and automated systems. Small and marginal farmers, constituting 86% of India’s farming population, found it especially challenging to justify investments in precision technologies.^{[2][37][38][39]}

Infrastructure limitations significantly hindered technology adoption. Inadequate rural electricity supply, poor internet connectivity, and unreliable telecommunications services constrained the effective deployment of digital solutions. Limited access to high-speed internet in rural areas prevented farmers from utilizing cloud-based farm management platforms and real-time advisory services.^[40][41][37]

Maintenance and technical support costs presented ongoing challenges. Limited availability of skilled technicians for equipment repair and maintenance in rural areas increased operational costs and reduced technology reliability. The need for continuous technical support and updates made precision agriculture less attractive for resource-constrained farmers.^{[41][37][42][2]}

Digital Literacy and Knowledge Barriers

Digital literacy emerged as a fundamental constraint, with nearly 40% of farmers reporting difficulty in understanding and using digital tools. Traditional farming communities showed resistance to adopting new technologies, often preferring conventional practices based on generational experience.^[41][37]

Language and cultural barriers limited technology accessibility. Many digital platforms initially available only in English or major languages excluded farmers speaking regional dialects. The lack of localized content relevant to specific agricultural practices and regional conditions reduced the practical value of digital advisory services.^[41]

Training and capacity building gaps hindered effective technology utilization. Inadequate training programs and limited demonstrations prevented farmers from realizing the full potential of precision agriculture tools. The absence of peer learning networks and farmer-to-farmer knowledge sharing slowed technology diffusion in rural communities.^[2][37][41]

Policy and Institutional Enablers

Government initiatives provided crucial support for precision agriculture adoption. The Digital Agriculture Mission’s ₹2,817 crore allocation represented unprecedented government commitment to agricultural digitization. Subsidies under the Kisan Drone scheme, covering up to 100% of drone costs (maximum ₹10 lakhs) for agricultural institutions, significantly reduced financial barriers.^[16][8][9]

The JAM Trinity (Jan Dhan-Aadhaar-Mobile) facilitated digital inclusion by enabling direct benefit transfers and reducing transaction costs for farmers. The Soil Health Card Scheme, distributing over 25 crore cards by 2025, provided farmers with scientific data for precision nutrient management.^{[43][44][45][46]}

State-level initiatives complemented central government programs. Uttar Pradesh’s partnership with Google Cloud Platform for the Open Network for Agriculture demonstrated innovative public-private collaboration models. MoUs signed with 19 states for Digital Public Infrastructure development ensured coordinated implementation of digital agriculture initiatives.^[23][8]

Financial inclusion mechanisms supported technology adoption. Increased agricultural credit targets reaching ₹20 lakh crore in 2024-25 provided farmers with resources for technology investments. Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY) integration with precision agriculture technologies improved crop insurance accessibility and claim settlement processes.^[47][48]

Market and Supply Chain Factors

Integration with digital marketplaces enhanced value realization for precision agriculture adopters. The e-NAM platform, connecting 1,410 mandis across 23 states and 4 union territories by 2024, provided farmers with better price discovery mechanisms. Direct buyer connections through digital platforms reduced dependence on traditional intermediaries.^[32][49][50]

Supply chain innovations supported precision agriculture scaling. Startups like Ninjacart, with ₹12,000+ crore annual transaction value, demonstrated the potential for technology-enabled supply chains. Cold chain integration with precision agriculture reduced post-harvest losses and improved product quality.^[13][4]

Quality certification and traceability systems created premium markets for precision agriculture products. Blockchain-based traceability solutions enabled farmers to access export markets and premium domestic segments demanding quality assurance.^[15][13]

Geographic Patterns of Effectiveness

High-Impact Regions and Crop Systems

Punjab and Haryana demonstrated exceptional success in precision agriculture adoption, driven by favorable agricultural infrastructure, higher farmer awareness, and strong institutional support. Punjab’s focus on paddy and wheat cultivation benefited significantly from precision planting, drone-based monitoring, and IoT-enabled irrigation systems. The region’s cooperative structure facilitated technology sharing and collective procurement, reducing individual farmer costs.^[22][51]

Maharashtra’s cotton belt emerged as a model for precision agriculture in dryland farming systems. Integration of weather advisory services, soil health monitoring, and pest management systems resulted in significant improvements in cotton yields and quality. The state’s progressive farmer networks accelerated technology diffusion through demonstration effects.^[2][3][52]

Andhra Pradesh’s success with horticultural crops highlighted the potential for precision agriculture in high-value farming systems. The Saagu Baagu program’s 21% yield improvement in chili cultivation demonstrated the effectiveness of digital advisory services for smallholder farmers. State government support for agritech startups created a conducive ecosystem for innovation.^[26]

Gujarat’s water-scarce environment drove innovation in precision irrigation technologies. Widespread adoption of drip irrigation, coupled with IoT-based monitoring systems, achieved significant water use efficiency improvements. The state’s focus on horticulture and cash crops provided economic justification for precision agriculture investments.^[3][24]

Regional Performance Variations

Irrigated versus rainfed agriculture showed distinct patterns of precision agriculture effectiveness. Irrigated regions demonstrated higher adoption rates and better outcomes due to controlled water environments enabling precise input management. Rainfed areas faced challenges in technology integration but showed promise in weather advisory and drought monitoring applications.^{[3][51][53][25]}

Crop-specific variations influenced regional effectiveness patterns. High-value crops like fruits, vegetables, and spices showed greater returns on precision agriculture investments compared to staple cereals. Cotton cultivation in Maharashtra and Gujarat achieved particularly impressive income improvements due to precision pest management and quality enhancement.^{[2][23][54][52]}

Infrastructure availability significantly influenced regional performance. States with better road connectivity, reliable electricity, and telecommunications infrastructure achieved higher technology adoption and effectiveness. Regions with established agricultural universities and extension services demonstrated faster precision agriculture scaling.^[41][22][51]

Adaptation to Local Conditions

Agro-climatic zone-specific solutions proved crucial for precision agriculture success. Semi-arid regions focused on water management technologies, while coastal areas emphasized salinity monitoring and cyclone preparedness systems. Hill regions adapted precision agriculture for terraced farming and soil conservation.^[53][34][54]

Cultural and social factors influenced technology adaptation patterns. Regions with higher literacy rates and greater exposure to technology showed faster adoption of digital advisory services. Community-based implementation models proved more effective than individual farmer approaches in certain regions.^[41][37][42]

Market proximity affected precision agriculture viability. Farmers closer to urban markets and processing centers achieved better price premiums for quality produce from precision agriculture. Export-oriented regions showed higher adoption due to quality and traceability requirements.^[32][23][13]

Policy and Program Recommendations

Short-Term Interventions (1-2 Years)

Immediate financial support mechanisms should prioritize subsidized access to basic precision agriculture tools. Expanding the Kisan Drone scheme to cover 50,000 women’s self-help groups would accelerate drone technology adoption while promoting gender inclusion. Interest-free loans for precision agriculture equipment through cooperative banks and FPOs could reduce the financial burden on smallholder farmers.^[28][17]

Digital literacy enhancement programs require urgent scaling. Integration of precision agriculture modules into existing Krishi Vigyan Kendra programs would leverage established extension networks. Mobile-based training applications in regional languages, coupled with field demonstrations, could reach farmers in remote areas effectively.^[41][37][47]

Infrastructure gap bridging demands coordinated action. Accelerated rural broadband expansion under BharatNet should prioritize agricultural regions with high precision agriculture potential. Solar-powered IoT device deployment could address electricity constraints in off-grid areas.^[40][8]

Pilot program expansion should build on successful models. Scaling the Saagu Baagu digital advisory program to additional states could replicate its documented success in improving yields and incomes. State-specific precision agriculture centers could provide localized solutions and technical support.^[26][22]

Medium-Term Strategies (3-5 Years)

Institutional capacity building requires comprehensive reform of agricultural extension systems. Integration of precision agriculture specialists into state agricultural departments would ensure sustained technical support. Public-private partnerships with agritech companies could leverage private sector innovation while maintaining public sector accessibility.^[11][15][47]

Data infrastructure development should establish comprehensive agricultural data ecosystems. Completion of the AgriStack initiative would provide farmers with unified digital identities and seamless access to services. Integration of satellite data, IoT sensors, and farmer-generated information into real-time advisory systems would enhance decision-making capabilities.^{[29][19][8][9]}

Value chain integration must connect precision agriculture with market opportunities. Development of precision agriculture clusters around processing centers and export hubs could create economies of scale. Quality certification programs linked to precision agriculture practices would enable premium pricing.^[32][23]

Regional specialization should leverage comparative advantages. State-specific precision agriculture strategies based on dominant crops and agro-climatic conditions would optimize resource allocation. Interstate knowledge sharing platforms could facilitate best practice replication across regions.^[22][52]

Long-Term Transformation (5-10 Years)

Comprehensive digital agriculture ecosystem development should create seamless farmer support systems. AI-powered predictive analytics integrated with real-time monitoring could provide proactive rather than reactive advisory services. Blockchain-based supply chain integration would ensure transparency from farm to fork.^[15][31]

Climate adaptation mainstreaming requires embedding precision agriculture into climate resilience strategies. Integration with the National Action Plan on Climate Change would ensure coordinated climate adaptation efforts. Development of climate-smart precision agriculture packages for different agro-ecological zones would enhance adaptive capacity.^[30][34][35]

Human capital development must create a new generation of tech-savvy farmers. Agricultural education curriculum reform should integrate precision agriculture and digital literacy. Professional development programs for agricultural graduates in precision agriculture specializations would build local expertise.^[16][37]

Innovation ecosystem strengthening should support continuous technological advancement. Agricultural innovation parks combining research institutions, startups, and farmer organizations could accelerate technology development and adoption. International collaboration on precision agriculture research would access global best practices and technologies.^[19][15]

Policy Coordination and Implementation Framework

Inter-ministerial coordination is essential for comprehensive precision agriculture promotion. Joint working groups between Agriculture Ministry, IT Ministry, and Space Ministry should ensure synergistic policy implementation. State-center coordination mechanisms must align central schemes with local agricultural priorities.^[29][8][9]

Monitoring and evaluation systems should track precision agriculture impacts systematically. Digital monitoring dashboards integrated with farmer databases would provide real-time adoption and outcome data. Impact assessment studies should document economic, environmental, and social benefits to guide policy refinement.^[2][31][8]

Regulatory framework modernization must keep pace with technological advancement. Drone operation regulations should balance safety concerns with agricultural needs. Data privacy and security frameworks for agricultural data must protect farmer interests while enabling service innovation.^[16][40]

Financing mechanism diversification should reduce dependence on government subsidies. Precision agriculture insurance products could protect farmers from technology risks. Private sector investment facilitation through tax incentives and regulatory clarity would accelerate market development.^[28][12][15]

Conclusions and Future Research Directions

The comprehensive analysis of secondary data from 2020-2025 reveals that precision agriculture and digital advisory technologies have demonstrated significant potential for transforming Indian smallholder farming systems, despite persistent adoption barriers. The documented evidence of 17-76% income improvements, 20% water savings, and enhanced climate resilience provides compelling justification for continued investment in digital agricultural transformation.^{[26][2][3][31]}

The trajectory from 12% precision agriculture adoption in 2020 to 35% in 2025 indicates accelerating technology diffusion, supported by unprecedented government investment of ₹2,817 crore through the Digital Agriculture Mission. Regional success stories in Punjab, Maharashtra, and Andhra Pradesh demonstrate that appropriate institutional support, farmer awareness, and infrastructure development can overcome traditional barriers to technology adoption.^{[1][2][22][5][8][26]}

Critical gaps remain in the empirical evidence base, particularly regarding long-term sustainability, environmental impacts, and equity outcomes of precision agriculture adoption. Future primary research should focus on longitudinal impact assessments examining technology persistence, farmer learning curves, and intergenerational knowledge transfer. Comparative studies across different agro-ecological zones would provide insights into technology adaptation and effectiveness variations.

The integration of climate resilience with precision agriculture emerges as a crucial area for future investigation. Research on precision agriculture’s contribution to climate adaptation and mitigation would inform policy decisions on agricultural climate action. Studies on the effectiveness of digital advisory services during extreme weather events would enhance understanding of technology’s role in building farmer resilience.

Policy research priorities should include analysis of optimal subsidy structures, assessment of public-private partnership models, and evaluation of regulatory frameworks supporting precision agriculture scaling. Economic analysis of precision agriculture value chains would identify bottlenecks and opportunities for market development. Social impact studies on gender, caste, and regional equity in precision agriculture access would ensure inclusive technological transformation.

The secondary data analysis reveals that India stands at a critical juncture in agricultural transformation, with precision agriculture technologies offering unprecedented opportunities to address productivity, income, and sustainability challenges. Continued investment in digital infrastructure, farmer capacity building, and innovation ecosystems will determine whether these technologies can deliver on their promise of transforming Indian agriculture for smallholder farmers nationwide.

Work Cited

1. https://www.iari.res.in/  
2. https://connectjournals.com/          
3. https://farmonaut.com/       
4. https://farmonaut.com/ 
5. https://farmonaut.com/    
6. https://www.growfurther.org/
7. https://www.techsciresearch.com/
8. https://www.drishtiias.com/       
9. https://visionias.in/   
10. https://www.icfa.org.in/
11. https://corpbiz.io/ 
12. https://www.kenresearch.com/ 
13. https://farmonaut.com/    
14. https://www.leadsquared.com/ 
15. https://farmonaut.com/     
16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov    
17. https://www.drishtiias.com/ 
18. https://www.pib.gov.in/
19. https://www.gatewayhouse.in/  
20. https://www.eoportal.org/
21. https://www.isro.gov.in/
22. https://www.nabard.org/     
23. https://diplomatist.com/      
24. https://nau.in/  
25. https://www.ils.res.in/  
26. https://www.weforum.org/     
27. https://voxdev.org/topic/
28. https://www.tractorforeveryone.com/  
29. https://www.pib.gov.in/  
30. https://www.pib.gov.in/   
31. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/     
32. https://openknowledge.fao.org/   
33. https://www.nitiforstates.gov.in/
34. https://www.ceew.in/  
35. https://www.sciencedirect.com/ 
36. https://www.leher.ag
37. https://www.ijfans.org/       
38. https://www.sciencedirect.com
39. https://www.sciencedirect.com
40. https://www.ijcrt.org/  
41. https://agriculture.institute/       
42. https://ncgg.org.in
43. https://www.iipa.org.in/
44. https://www.pib.gov.in/
45. https://www.pib.gov.in/
46. https://www.india.gov.in/
47. https://www.mckinsey.com
48. https://www.cropin.com/
49. https://www.pib.gov.in/
50. https://www.pib.gov.in/
51. https://currentagriculturetrends.vitalbiotech.org
52. https://www.sciencedirect.com
53. https://www.journalacri.com/
54. https://journalacri.com/
55. https://farmonaut.com/
56. https://journalacri.com/
57. https://www.ceew.in/
58. https://www.mckinsey.com
59. https://journals.worldbiologica.com/
60. https://journaljeai.com/
61. https://www.sciencedirect.com/
62. https://india.mongabay.com/
63. https://reports.weforum.org/
64. https://documents1.worldbank.org/
65. https://www.undp.org/
66. https://gujarat.coe-iot.com/
67. https://farmonaut.com/
68. https://www.sciencedirect.com/
69. https://www.pib.gov.in/
70. https://sansad.in/
71. https://www.drishtiias.com/
72. https://systems.enpress-publisher.com/
73. https://enam.gov.in
74. https://www.worldbank.org/
75. https://www.iari.res.in/
76. https://darpg.gov.in/
77. https://www.nrsc.gov.in/
78. https://www.iasgyan.in/
79. https://farmonaut.com/
80. https://farmonaut.com/
81. https://www.isro.gov.in/
82. https://www.iotinsider.com/
83. https://www.agronomyjournals.com/
84. https://www.frontiersin.org/
85. https://www.sciencedirect.com/
86. https://www.nabard.org/
87. https://journals.plos.org/
88. https://prsindia.org/
89. https://www.tandfonline.com/